Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34
  1. #21
    OpelAus Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i found a deffinate difference between 95 and 98, y is it a waste? ive added octane booster on top of that and noticed more defference again.
    Well... explain the scientific method in how you measured the improvement?

    Considering the ECU inthe astra/barina can't compensate for fuel higher than 95RON I am wondering how all this extra performance eventuated.

    Use of increased RON fuel doesn't mean a car will produce more power. The most cost effective octanc fuel to use is the one the car was designed for. In the case of normally aspirated astras and barinas that is 95RON. Using 98RON fuel is a complete waste of money.

    I reckon if we did blind tests between 95RON and 98RON fuels no one here could tell the difference.

  2. #22
    OpelAus Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hawthorn, Melbourne
    Posts
    134
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I havn't seen 95RON anywhere.. where do you get it from? Is there a difference in price between 95 and 98?
    Astra TS... 1.8 litres of fury! Click here to enlarge

  3. #23
    OpelAus Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Brisbane > Northside
    Age
    39
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rjastra
    the Barina/Astra engines (1.4,1.8,2.2) will run fine on 91Ron and have a tiny amount more kW/Nm on 95Ron. 98RON is a waste of money
    Actually... I have a dyno proven 6kw (10%) gain with my 1.4L Corsa C using BP Ultimate fuel.

    This was dyno at a dyno day last year at GRP automotive in Brisbane... I have my dyno sheet here but no scanner Click here to enlarge
    Click here to enlarge

  4. #24
    OpelAus Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Brisbane > Northside
    Age
    39
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rjastra
    Well... explain the scientific method in how you measured the improvement?

    Considering the ECU inthe astra/barina can't compensate for fuel higher than 95RON I am wondering how all this extra performance eventuated.

    Use of increased RON fuel doesn't mean a car will produce more power. The most cost effective octanc fuel to use is the one the car was designed for. In the case of normally aspirated astras and barinas that is 95RON. Using 98RON fuel is a complete waste of money.

    I reckon if we did blind tests between 95RON and 98RON fuels no one here could tell the difference.
    Wrong.

    I'll copy and paste my description of a 'knock sensor' from a previous thread to give you an idea on how modern engines cope with higher octane fuel.

    See... there is this think called a knock sensor. Your engine (upon startup) will slowly and slightly advance the timing to the highest point possible without 'pinging' which will trip off the knock sensor. This is a very random process, and there really isn't much anyone can do about playing with the setting unless you have a programable ECU (which you would find a good tune in the first place, not constantly change it). The point of 'pinging' in a car is determined alot by two main factors. One, is the octane of a fuel, and the second is the oxygen content in the air. Obviously, its hard to get optimal air conditions (ie. pure oxygen into the engine) and also hard to get consistant fuel octane (putting BP ultimate in my engine is garanteed for 98 octane... but that doesn't mean part of the batch could be 99 or 100 octane etc.). This is the reason cars tend to get 'sluggish' during hot days, as heat will disperse the oxygen in the air more, as well as increase internal heat in the engine (another factor... but a 'lesser' factor than fuel/air). On the rare occasion, your car can produce a handfull of kilowatts more thanks to higher oxygen content in the air, and good fuel in the tank.
    Click here to enlarge

  5. #25
    OpelAus Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I havn't seen 95RON anywhere..
    ummm... it's what is commonly called premium unleaded.

    Actually... I have a dyno proven 6kw (10%) gain with my 1.4L Corsa C using BP Ultimate fuel
    Compared to what? regular ULP or PULP? Was it done on the same day? same dyno? some dyno settings.

    I'll copy and paste my description of a 'knock sensor' from a previous thread to give you an idea on how modern engines cope with higher octane fuel.
    In fact I think you will find the the ECU/engine is setup to work at its optimum on 95RON fuel. The ECU tries to run constantly at these settings until it encounters pinging. Then it retards timing etc until the pinging stops.
    Putting 98RON fuel in the car has no benefit as the ECU has no fueling/timing mappings for this fuel.

  6. #26
    Anonymous
    Guest
    edit

  7. #27
    OpelAus Enthusiast woody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    48
    Posts
    1,022
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    BP Ultime is a high octane fuel garanteed to be at least 98 octane throughout the mixture. It contains no agents, its the purest form of fuel you can get from a pump.
    Break. Depends on what you call agents: Agree its the purest form of fuel from the pump but even Ultimate has agents - these aid in the cleaning properties of the fuel and (in some cars) the performace gains:

    Quote from the BP Ultimate material saftey data sheet regarding the composition of the fuel:


    2. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
    A complex mixture of volatile hydrocarbons containing paraffins, naphthenes, olefins and aromatics with carbon numbers predominantly between C4 and C12.

    May contain oxygenates. May also contain small quantities of proprietary
    performance additives.

    Hazardous Components
    Benzene, EINECS No. 200-753-7, CAS No. 71-43-2 F, T, R45 May cause cancer, R11 Highly flammable, R48/23/24/25 Toxic: Danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure through inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed.
    Gasoline, EINECS No: 289-220-8, CAS No: 86290-81-5, T, R45 May cause cancer, R65 Harmful: may cause lung damage if swallowed, R38 Irritating to skin.
    (>90%)

    and a link to the doc for those who are interested:


    http://www.msds.bp.com.au/pdf/ref_626_BP_Ultimate.pdf
    Click here to enlarge

  8. #28
    OpelAus Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Brisbane > Northside
    Age
    39
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rjastra
    Actually... I have a dyno proven 6kw (10%) gain with my 1.4L Corsa C using BP Ultimate fuel
    Compared to what? regular ULP or PULP? Was it done on the same day? same dyno? some dyno settings.
    Compared to multiple results from different people with the same car running 91 ron fuel on the same dyno (this was said to me by the dyno operature who showed me previous saved results from the same model of car previously... I did not actually see any other Corsa C's on the dyno on that day, however). My results are also 10% more than one of the other members here who put thier car on the dyno and posted thier results (they had 47kw @ wheels... I have ~54kw).

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rjastra
    I'll copy and paste my description of a 'knock sensor' from a previous thread to give you an idea on how modern engines cope with higher octane fuel.
    In fact I think you will find the the ECU/engine is setup to work at its optimum on 95RON fuel. The ECU tries to run constantly at these settings until it encounters pinging. Then it retards timing etc until the pinging stops.
    Putting 98RON fuel in the car has no benefit as the ECU has no fueling/timing mappings for this fuel.
    No, your missing the point. A knock sensor WILL change the mapping of a car to allow for even higher octanes of fuel. Because this is a mechanical process, gains are usually much smaller than propper tuning.... but there are still gains to be had by putting in higher octane fuel (to some degree.... as the higher the octane, the slower it burns).
    Click here to enlarge

  9. #29
    OpelAus Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No, your missing the point. A knock sensor WILL change the mapping of a car to allow for even higher octanes of fuel.
    This is how it works.....

    Based on its programming,
    the PCM advances spark to a preset level for
    different conditions. The preset spark advance
    is typically close to the knock point because
    the system relies on the knock sensor as a
    warning device.
    Most knock sensors send a base or “no
    knocking” reference signal to the PCM.
    If knocking occurs, the sensor detects the
    increased vibration and increases its signal
    to the PCM. The PCM then slightly retards
    timing until the sensor signal returns to the
    reference level.
    If a temporary condition caused the knock,
    the PCM will set spark timing to the
    programmed advance. If the knock returns,
    the PCM will cycle spark timing, advancing
    timing until knock is encountered and then
    retarding timing until the knock is gone.
    In other words if the engine was designed and tested to run optimally on 95RON fuel then the base maps will be configured for the that fuel. If you run 91RON fuel it may detect pinging and retard timing etc etc to eliminate it.
    If you run 98RON fuel in the car it will have no better performance than the 95RON fuel simply because the ECU will still run with the standard maps. It has no mystical power to determine that the fuel being used is of a higher octane and what "new" maps to use.

    On modern engines with sophisticated engine management systems, the engine
    can operate efficiently on fuels of a wider range of octane rating, but there
    remains an optimum octane for the engine under specific driving conditions......
    If you are already using the proper octane fuel, you will not obtain more
    power from higher octane fuels. The engine will be already operating at
    optimum settings, and a higher octane should have no effect on the management
    system. Your driveability and fuel economy will remain the same. The higher
    octane fuel costs more, so you are just throwing money away.

  10. #30
    OpelAus Participant Brett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    175
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I said which is the best 98ron petrol to use, I already use BP ultimate, but wanted to know which is the best
    07, BMW 335i , Graphite Metallic, Procede tune, 2.5in turboback, Hartge LSD.

    Performance:

    370 Rear wheel HP (276kw atw), 535nm rear wheel newton metres.
    (approximately 345kw at the flywheel)

    0-60mph in 4.3 seconds
    Standing ¼ mile in 12.4 seconds


    For more info check out:
    http://www.vishnutuning.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •