The car doesnt have any variable cam timing, there are roumors about it having an intake that switches from long runners to short runners at a certain rpm however im not sure they have that. would explain why around 3500rpm the car sort of livens up though.
Im going to start making an xdf with the data you have provided as well as the data from the other forum
Holden Barina XC SRI
16.23 Second 1/4 Mile, No boost..... Yet
"-I'd rather loose by a mile because I built my own car, than win by an inch cause someone else built it for me. Your car, is your story, so don't let someone else write the book." ~Moog
Sorry, I didn't mean cam timing. I was talking about spark timing/advance.Originally Posted by SilentShout
The car doesnt have any variable cam timing, there are roumors about it having an intake that switches from long runners to short runners at a certain rpm however im not sure they have that. would explain why around 3500rpm the car sort of livens up though.
Im going to start making an xdf with the data you have provided as well as the data from the other forum
I was replying to the post before sorry i should have quoted it
Holden Barina XC SRI
16.23 Second 1/4 Mile, No boost..... Yet
"-I'd rather loose by a mile because I built my own car, than win by an inch cause someone else built it for me. Your car, is your story, so don't let someone else write the book." ~Moog
Oh lol, the confusion is too damn high.I was replying to the post before sorry i should have quoted it
I tend to think there are 98octane and 91octane maps regardless the power difference. If the engine doesnīt have camshaft phase shifting its pretty likely they reduced power by decreasing ignition advance, yes. If you have that kind of file, please upload it
Heres what maps and line descriptors i found until this morning. Hundreds more inside that file
Kennfeldliste_16-01-2015.jpg
Yes, variable camshaft timing was the word i was looking for
Iīve disconnected that vacuum line when i modified my girlfriends car to LPG, so its no rumour. Unfortunally i havenīt found a way to read her ecu. Security access denied at some tools. Will try it with MPPS later the day.
what car does your gilrfriend have??
i have what you would know as the Corsa C SRI 1.8L and the tool I used was a Galletto1260 clone and it worked no problems as it is able to communicate using the KWP2000 protocol which is what the car uses.
I was entering data into Tunerpro for the MAF map etc and slowly attempting an XDF file and then boom, "Tunerpro has stopped working" or loosely translated to "You are gonna feel pretty foolish if you didnt save your work"
Back to the start.
Holden Barina XC SRI
16.23 Second 1/4 Mile, No boost..... Yet
"-I'd rather loose by a mile because I built my own car, than win by an inch cause someone else built it for me. Your car, is your story, so don't let someone else write the book." ~Moog
I have the same car as SilentShout, just the 2005 facelifted model, but I don't think they changed anything engine wise.I tend to think there are 98octane and 91octane maps regardless the power difference. If the engine doesnīt have camshaft phase shifting its pretty likely they reduced power by decreasing ignition advance, yes. If you have that kind of file, please upload it
Its a 2002 Opel Astra G 1.8 16V 125HP
I tried KWP2000+, Galletto 1260 and none worked. Will use MPPS later.
Found another few maps.
Kennfeldliste_16-01-2015.jpg
the facelift never came with an egr valve, I was unlucky enough to have one being a 2001
Holden Barina XC SRI
16.23 Second 1/4 Mile, No boost..... Yet
"-I'd rather loose by a mile because I built my own car, than win by an inch cause someone else built it for me. Your car, is your story, so don't let someone else write the book." ~Moog
Oh yeah, I remember Shadow110's SRi having an EGR valve. I'm glad mine doesn't have it haha.the facelift never came with an egr valve, I was unlucky enough to have one being a 2001
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote