Victor Bray is a burnout God!!!!!!!!!!!
when i was at powercruise last weekend i took my ipod nano and used the video camera on it to film this
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=...2387704&ref=mf
and i just thought i'd share it A because its a sick burnout and B because im just shocked at how good the quality of the video is compared to the 5mp in my phone
Warning: This is an Old Thread
This discussion is older than 120 days. information contained in it may no longer be current . Please think of the children before resurrecting this ancient thread!
Victor Bray is a burnout God!!!!!!!!!!!
BroTek Performance Pty Ltd
Current: 2003 Astra SRi Turbo & 2004 Barina SXi
Ex's: 2001 Astra CD & 2001 Astra SRi 2.2, plus a long list of non Opels...
That's awsome quality. Yes Victor is King of Burnouts.
(13 psi of Black SRi Turbo Terror!!!)http://www.opelaus.com/forums/showthread.php?23383-My-Astra-SRi-Turbo-and-my-other-Toys
AWAITING NEW ASTRA J VXR TO COME OUT IN OZ!!!
pity the new one fails and has no camera.
quality is very good in full daylight, low light forget about it
2013 Ford Focus ST
Calibra - The only car that will institutionalise you and send you broke in the mean time
Sure, we dont have to worry about viking raids or scurvy anymore, but instead we make a daily routine of sitting in flimsy, fibreglass (or metal) boxes full of gasoline which are propelled in opposing directions on the freeway at velocities matching that of low flying aircraft.
This is a roundabout way of saying that cars are dangerous....
here's one at night
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/...v=439684172704
good quality for sure.....and a controlled burnout.....not just circle after circle.
I suspect the iPod Nano shoots better video than most phones because it doesn't have to combine a few dozen pixels into one. From memory, the iPod Nano's video camera is only about 0.3 MP.
Just another example of how more megapixels doesn't always mean better
Last edited by lee; 12th October 2010 at 11:46 AM.
Megapixels really mean nothing in video cameras it's just become the buying must have "most megapixels, because that makes it the best" same with digital cameras and dslrs.. It means something yes but the difference between 12mp and 14mp I don't think the usual amatuer photographer would ever pick up on it.
I remember reading a review on a Sony handycam, where in which the previous shape was expensive as it had all jap internals and really good quality and was 10mp I think.. Then they released the next series (current one) and used cheaper parts and the quality of video from it now is absolute peice of shit at night cause the low light sensors are rubbish and don't work well.. They charge same price as previous model did and ya know what it still sold (got some really shit reviews too) and the reason why it sold.. It was marketed with the newest tech for vid cameras being 14.1mp and people believed it
/rant
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)