A BIG NO! from me..
my eyes dont like 3D tv so waste of money for me
I saw a demonstration of this at work a few weeks back. Meh...
The majority of people I've asked don't really give a shit about 3D TV. I'm interested to know who is buying one?
Warning: This is an Old Thread
This discussion is older than 120 days. information contained in it may no longer be current . Please think of the children before resurrecting this ancient thread!
3D TV is only waste of time and money IMHO. When they work without glasses let me know and I might have a look.
Renault SPORT Clio RS 200 Cup Trophee
as someone who sells them, my personal opinions are,
-3d feature is kinda cool. Some moments look great in 3d, whilst others look like I've put on someone else's glasses.
-3d is certainly not something you'd watch 'all the time' (eg. it's not like you'd put the glasses on every time you watch TV
-There will be more of a market for them when there is more content, especially live action content (it's just a couple of animations atm)
I think 3d should be looked upon as an extra (like a sunroof for example), not the thing that defines the TV.
-Forgetting the 3d feature, the TV itself (in particular the LED range from Samsung) is great - good picture, improvements over previous generations of edgelit TVs, great internet and skype connectivity through Ethernet (wireless on the bundled BluRay). Sexy remote control.
The genesis of the LED Samsungs is essetially they took the range topping Series 8 LEDs, added the 3d functionality and a new metalled base and hey presto you've got the Series 7000 3d TV.
Recommended retail on the 46" LED is $3699. Without advertising too much, there's enough money in them for us to be able to put them out around 3.2Ks, so if you go into harvey's or JB there's certainly room push them on their pricing. The interesting thing is that at this price they're cheaper then the Series 8 LEDs were (and that's without the 3d function).
tbh I'd be buying a Samsung TV for it's technology, and Internet@TV, Skype and 3DTV are all examples of that. If picture/onboard sound was the defining thing I'd probably go with a Sharp TV instead, or pay out some dollars and get a Euro made Phillips Anamorphic (21:9) TV ($8,999 retail). We got one out of the box last week and it absolutely rocks.
'91Alfa Romeo 164Q
'02 Jaguar S-Type 3.0 ~ '98 BMW 740il ~ '02 Saab 9-5 aero ~ '99 Saab 9-3 Viggen Convertible ~'00 Alfa Romeo 166 3.0 ~ '97 Volvo S40 T4 ~ '94 Saab 900s 2.5 ~ '98 Opel Vectra 2.0
No from me
:: OpelAus Senior Moderator ::
:: OLD: 2000 Opel Corsa B 1.4 - Old info here - 48.7kw atw
:: OLD: 2003 Opel Corsa C SRi - Old info here - 84.8kw atw
:: OLD: 2003 Opel Astra SRiT - 182.3kw atw
:: Daily: 2001 E46 BMW 325Ci Coupe – 2.5L 5spd Manual
:: Project: 1983 AE71 Toyota Corolla CS-X - not sure what to do yet... ::
www.pauljakubicki.com
facebook.com/PaulJakubickiPhotography
Event Photographer/Writer for SpeedNation.com.au
no from me too
*BTM* Opel Astra SRi 2.2L
"As a final incentive before giving up on a difficult task, try to imagine it successfully accomplished by someone you violently dislike"Originally Posted by glider
K. Zenios
I'd be happy with a new LCD for starters. Plus I could never justify spending that much money on a TV.
want to upgrade to a bigger LED, but tbh i wont ever get a 3D tv
2013 Ford Focus ST
Calibra - The only car that will institutionalise you and send you broke in the mean time
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)