PDA

View Full Version : [tech] Old Skool help req'd



pred8r
24th June 2006, 06:15 PM
Old Skool question;

Does anyone here know if youll get better fuel economy and power by using a quadrajet carby instead of a 650 holley on a 302 Cleveland?

Considering the quaddy is self-metering on fuel and can flow around 900CFM as opposed to the Holley which only flows 650 and just pours the stuff in (Almost like they had shares in an Oil Co.)

Ive never heard of it being done, and just wondered if anyone else had and what results were obtained.

Turblue
24th June 2006, 06:56 PM
YES...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If properly tuned. There are a hell of a lot of tricks with the quaddie that improve performance etc. I may even still have my old HP book on the quaddie.

Accelerator pump mods, metering rods, etc....

They are a great carb. A classic spreadbore. I loved it on my old 308.

By now they would be very long in the tooth, and hard to get parts for, I would have thought. Carter made a carbie based on the quadrajet. It was an all alloy job that was great.

Dude, you are talking my era..!!!

pred8r
24th June 2006, 07:14 PM
OMG!!!! someone who can speak venturi!!!!!

Turblue
24th June 2006, 07:26 PM
Yes, there was life before fuel injection..!!!!

I spent a lot of time tuning the quaddie and the Carter. I had tune up kits with various rods, hangers and jets. Even a set of wire drills and diamond files.

I may be a geek now, but was a tuner then......

pred8r
24th June 2006, 07:33 PM
no, not geek......old skool.....like me.....i just like cars AND computers....not a geek.....no......not.......geek :(

MatsHolden
24th June 2006, 07:38 PM
I loved it on my old 308.


mmmm 308. Love em.

Never late in a 308! :D V8 muscle so much more exciting than 4 or 6 cylinders.

xplosv57
24th June 2006, 08:36 PM
Well youre never gonna get ridiculously good fuel consumption out of any carby V8 so id sacrifice a few l/100kms for the power increase of the Holley!

Turblue
24th June 2006, 08:42 PM
A Holley is like using a sledgehammer. They have pretty rough metering.

Quadrajet is more accurate and still very capable.

pred8r
24th June 2006, 09:15 PM
Well youre never gonna get ridiculously good fuel consumption out of any carby V8 so id sacrifice a few l/100kms for the power increase of the Holley!
Yeah, what Turblue said :p

You can get good economy and ok power, or a rocket and need shares in BP. EFI is really not much different - it mostly just stops people 'fiddling'.

This is why i asked the question. Holleys litrally flood the engine with fuel, the Quaddys are a MUCH better and SO MUCH simpler design at doing what they do. But I've never heard of one being run on a Clevo (Ford is Carter/Holley, GM was Quadrajet/Rochester) and was wondering if there was a reason. These days an adapter plate is $200 and 10mins on a CNC mill so not really an excuse.

Urban Legends are a wonderful thing.

Have you installed a pod filter and 3" zorst yet? hehehe

Wraith
24th June 2006, 11:08 PM
Old Skool question;

Does anyone here know if youll get better fuel economy and power by using a quadrajet carby instead of a 650 holley on a 302 Cleveland?

Considering the quaddy is self-metering on fuel and can flow around 900CFM as opposed to the Holley which only flows 650 and just pours the stuff in (Almost like they had shares in an Oil Co.)

Ive never heard of it being done, and just wondered if anyone else had and what results were obtained.

A good question that's more easily answered depending on exactly what's done to that 302 you have and exactly what type of 650 holey we're talking about as well, ie : spreadbore, squarebore, vac secondaries, mechanical secondaries, double pumper etc........but in short you'll definitely get better economy from the quadrajet as it is a spreadbore vac. seconcondaries carb and was made this way for low end response and cruise economy.

From what you say above I'm assuming the 650 is a double pumper, if so it will only run well on a "worked" 302 and needs to be metred correctly.

A double pumper 650 Holley on a "stock" 302 will not run as good as a vac. secondary carb, it'll simply flood the engine.

What you should get a hold of is a Carter AFB, these were Ford factory units on Cleveland V8's and run as well on them as Quadrajets did on GM Chev and Holden V8's.

Edelbrock also made a copy of this carb with better metering options built in.

Quadrajet was a great carbie, with vac. secondaries and the Aust. version could flow to 780cfm - don't worry too much about the cfm figure, 650cfm is still enough flow to feed a 500hp small or big block V8.

Guess I'm showing my age here, but this topic brings back strong memories of my old 9 sec. 350 chev powered XU1, which was fed by a Phil Soderstrom built Holley 1050cfm dominator squarebore double pumper and made 593BHP (atw), interesting thing is the dyno readout which showed at 6250rpm, the cfm requirement by the engine was only about 620cfm.

Wraith
24th June 2006, 11:28 PM
mmmm 308. Love em.

Never late in a 308! :D V8 muscle so much more exciting than 4 or 6 cylinders.

Gee wiz, I spead to do my response on this thread, I missed a couple posts like this one.

I couldn't agree more Mat, absolutely true and I'm talking from experience.

Having owned a 308 VH SL/E for twelve years, a Torana L34, an XU1 with 350 chev mentioned above, a Sandman panel van with worked 253 and most recently an LS1 powered HSV R8 and experienced countless others from mates and now owning a V6 and a turbo 4, my greatest joy is still well and truly with the V8's. I really miss them........

I'm hopefully going to get a hold of a Monaro coupe soon and apply some modern technology to the V8 engine (forced induction) and start enjoying the experience once again.

No need to worry about fuel comsumption, it'll be a weekend warrior, not a daily driver.........

mr_sikma
25th June 2006, 01:14 AM
Gee wiz, I spead to do my response on this thread, I missed a couple posts like this one.

I couldn't agree more Mat, absolutely true and I'm talking from experience.

Having owned a 308 VH SL/E for twelve years, a Torana L34, an XU1 with 350 chev mentioned above, a Sandman panel van with worked 253 and most recently an LS1 powered HSV R8 and experienced countless others from mates and now owning a V6 and a turbo 4, my greatest joy is still well and truly with the V8's. I really miss them........

I'm hopefully going to get a hold of a Monaro coupe soon and apply some modern technology to the V8 engine (forced induction) and start enjoying the experience once again.

No need to worry about fuel comsumption, it'll be a weekend warrior, not a daily driver.........

it is good beating a 8 in a 4cyl tho ;)

i have a 1.75 stromberg carby on my 2.6 with the turbo set-up.

entice
25th June 2006, 09:01 AM
hrmmm... me, IO much prefer the webers.

problem is, trying to find trumpets, socks or even redline/borg warner filters for these is gettiong really challenging, and really expensive.

as is teh cost of jets, venturi's and emulsion tubes...

Turblue
25th June 2006, 09:57 AM
WRAITH...!!!!

Thank you..!!!!

It was an Edlebrock I ended up with after the airhorn warped on the Quaddie. A very nice, very tunable carb.

I agree that the double pumpers were no good for most stock applications. They used way too much fuel. And the mech secondaries did not help. For the street, you really need vacc secondaries.

I'm flashing back to two cars mates had.
1: Street driven 12.3sec XA fairmont on nitrous
2: LJ Torana with a stroked 308 (355) 474hp direct port nitrous. 10sec 1/4's.

"Turblue sheds a tears, and pays hommage to the V8."

KID_SRi
25th June 2006, 05:35 PM
On my 351 Cleveland, I was Running a 850 Double Pumper when I bought it.
I later changed to a Barry Grant Street Demon. That was around 780cfm, Just like a Holley 780 Annalur(SP?) Discharge. Difference was the BG was Alcohol Ready. I later rebuilt the engine(Mick Webb Built) and took it to a 383(Pro-Stroke Crank) with Eagle Performance Twisted Peak Alloy Heads. And the Shock that took everyone by suprise, I ran it on a Gas Research 1000cfm Straight Gas Twin 500cfm Mixers. After the Build and Gas, She was good for 700hp @ The Fly(1st dyno after run in).

pred8r
25th June 2006, 06:09 PM
The Holley is a 650 vac-sec. I was never overly wrapped with the carter (it originally had one), the engine is out of a ZJ which had them factory and was a POS (could've just been stuffed though).
It chirped M50 dragtyres (approx. equiv. widths to a 295 or 305 tyre) on the 1-2 shift with the holley(on real OLD fuel, possibly even with 2 stroke mixed in) but never even got close to that with the carter (on fresh stuff).

I THINK I mild cammed it but its been so long i honestly cant remember. I know I hardened seated it, so PULP is no prob anymore.
Needs extractors though and a crossover/balancing pipe on the twin system.
I wont be doing the stroker/alloy head bit as it'll be a basic cruiser and besides for the $4k that those few things will cost, thats a LONG way to a 460 (or a ford motorsport crate motor, or XR6T or........etc etc) if I did decide to go that way.

Apart from that, if the costs arnt kept to a absolute miminum, Ill end up divorced and homeless with it rammed somewhere it shouldnt :D

Dave
26th June 2006, 03:17 AM
jesus i have little to no idea what you guys are talkin about.


I understand that carb and v8 and fuel and tyre = fun :p


Shows what i know :rolleyes:

KID_SRi
2nd July 2006, 03:30 PM
A mate of mine is Running a Ford Performance Wet Sleeve 351 Windsor in a Cortina. The engine owes him $80k (In total) It has $15k of Barry Grant Methanol System. 1st dyno after running in she pumped nearly 700hp @ Wheels and running 10.5-10.9 sec ET @ Easternats.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v329/KID_SRi/TheCorti-1.jpg

Its a F'n Animal of a Car.