PDA

View Full Version : Ebay fuel thing



EL BURITO
31st October 2005, 03:37 AM
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Fuel-Saver-4-Holden-Astra-Vectra-Barina-Cruze-Calais-VQ_W0QQitemZ4585922101QQcategoryZ72469QQrdZ1QQcmdZ ViewItem

has any one seen this in use befor is it a load of $hit. will it void my warranty.

R3N
31st October 2005, 04:22 AM
Well, think about it... if it was really that good... wouldn't it be selling in every single car accessory/workshop there is?

NUTTTR
31st October 2005, 09:41 AM
hahahahaha........ I still say that 31.47% of people make up statistics...

LOL

This product is a joke..... a magnet can help you save 27.4% of fuel? Wow...

woody
31st October 2005, 10:10 AM
Not saying it's true or that i believe it for an instant but did a web seach and found some supporting info...

http://www.world-wire.com/news/1215040001.html

btm
31st October 2005, 01:55 PM
hmmmm - interesting

InsaneAsylum
31st October 2005, 02:19 PM
i reckon its more likely to find the G spot than to save fuel

woody
31st October 2005, 02:27 PM
G spots easy mate i can point you in the right direction for that...

InsaneAsylum
31st October 2005, 02:42 PM
G spots easy mate i can point you in the right direction for that...

what are you saying???????????? you got magnets or what???? :D

Namus
31st October 2005, 02:55 PM
Astra G spots? lol

BassyAstra
31st October 2005, 03:02 PM
Ahahahahahahha woodddskeee.

woody
31st October 2005, 03:33 PM
I'm a man of the world!!! I've found the old hot spot once or twice!! :cool:

btm
31st October 2005, 03:35 PM
You da man woody!! :D

InsaneAsylum
31st October 2005, 03:57 PM
now i know why they call you woody :D

Austra SRi
31st October 2005, 08:57 PM
"NASA technology applied to everyday living provides relief for both consumers and the environment" (??)

If anyone out there is still wondering whether this is true or not, NASA launch vehicles utilise an oxygen / hydrogen mix propellant, so any connection this has to everyday motoring and fossil-fuel combustion is lost on me?


How does NASA develop and use such technologies when they use a fuel whose only emission is H2O and when magnetic technolgies do not form part of either their core business, exploration or R&D missions??

The 'waste' from the SRBs (Solid Rocket Boosters) on the Shuttle launches is... water, with 0-5% of natural atmospheric content being water vapour i.e clouds.


MC G & Dizzy D say "Don't believe the hype"


It's a scam.

EL BURITO
31st October 2005, 11:03 PM
noted. not going to purchace

Desty
31st October 2005, 11:11 PM
Copyright © 2004, World-Wire. All rights reserved.
Issuers of news releases and not World-Wire are solely responsible for the accuracy of the content.

World-wire is a website where anyone can post anything within reason. This is simply a "media release" posted by magnetizer.net.

But hey, if you buy one of these devices, I've got some great land for sale... little bit wet, but great fixer-upper potential!!!!

Clint
31st October 2005, 11:33 PM
i wouldnt immediatly say its no good, a year or 2 back on the news they had the same thing tested on various cars, new, old, small, family and 4wd i think, and the results did make a difference. i dont remember numbers but they showed numbers and it was worth it depending on how many k's u do. it did boost performance, they dyno tested all the cars, lifted the power in the lower revs and made the engine run a lot smoother. it was on today tonight if anyone is interested in finding out about it. it wasnt the exact same brand, but it was the same concept

EL BURITO
31st October 2005, 11:37 PM
i can only remember seeing the one with the injecter thingys that reduced the amout of fuel was injected

16vopl
31st October 2005, 11:52 PM
this would be similar to the 'hiclone'
that made the air coming into the engine into a 'vortex' supposably making the engine perform better.



NASA dont only have rockets, they have work cars etc that run on petrol and not rocket fuel.
i dont see it being specific to there rockets.

buy it and tell us what you think... if youve got the money get it dynoed before and after...

Austra SRi
1st November 2005, 07:47 PM
16vopl...

Thanks for clarifying that NASA has work cars that run on petrol. No really…

My comments were merely clarifying that the press release places this particular device in the context of ‘NASA technology applied to everyday living’. NASA does no associated research linking it to the use or necessity of such a device so if it’s too good to be true…

It’s about improving combustion and efficiency, no matter what the fuel. So as NASA doesn’t refine its own fuels, nor is involved in research on base petroleum products, I’d doubt very much this happens to be running as a NASA ‘side project’.

No need to provide definitive results when it's nothing more than a scam: it would be fitted to every vehicle rolling out of our factories if it really did what it claimed.

Your money is better left in your pocket, m'boy.

16vopl
1st November 2005, 09:31 PM
then why arnt hybrid engines fitted to every car as standard out of the factory?
i was just saying that the statement of 'nasa technology applied in every day use' can be justified because its such a broad statement. it could simply be talking about the type of magnet or the plastic used..

like i said buy it and try it, get your car dynoed and see if it works...


anyway there are alot of new things that arnt released in every car as standard for a lot of reasons and thats a whole different arguement...

MiksOpel
1st November 2005, 10:34 PM
Settle guys, its no biggy,

This particular world-wire article is written through "public relations" meaning it is biased towards the company. Would you believe that Today-tonight/Current-Affairs can be paid by brands to cover a particular story,
A basic eg, A frozen nuggets company pays TT/CA to cover a story on how little "real" meat there is meat pies, so no-one buys meat pies, but subsitutes their choice for frozen nuggets.
TT/CA, it may mean its true, but most likley it has been paid for.

There are thousands of smaller, non commercialised products in the world that do improve daily living, but because their not endorsed by major brands, they mean nothing.
Its our own perceptions that brands mean everything, and we rely on public relations and advertisments to tell us of a brands popularity.

This product may make a difference, but selling to "never-seen" buyers through "looks like a scam" ebay shop wont help.
They need backed up claims through reliable sources, articles maybe even celebrity endorsements?

16vopl
1st November 2005, 10:37 PM
bahahahaha i cant beleive people actually watch that crap.
honestly.

who ever thought aldies was an aussie store needed a smack in the head.

InsaneAsylum
2nd November 2005, 08:43 AM
there was an add on e-bay a while back for "fuel saving device"

It was a block of wood under the accelerator pedal. the funny thing is, it actually works.

btm
3rd November 2005, 09:30 AM
there was an add on e-bay a while back for "fuel saving device"

It was a block of wood under the accelerator pedal. the funny thing is, it actually works.

are they cheap to buy? :p